“Even the dogs may eat of the crumbs that fall from the rich man’s table;
and in these days, when the rich in knowledge eat such specialized food at such separate tables,
only the dogs have the chance of a balanced diet.”
Sir Geoffrey Vickers, 1965
Image 1: The Three Bummers – Edward Jump’s cartoon shows Bummer and Lazarus begging scraps from Emperor Norton.Transitioning to the New Reality for Project Managers
In order to position some of GPM Global’s insights into the transitions and evolution of project management we have observed over the past thirty years, we wanted to provide some context based on our years of working with leading standards bodies and professional associations such as (in no particular order):
- International Standards Organization (ISO)
- International Project Management Association (IPMA)
- APMG International
- Global Alliance for the Project Professions (GAPPS)
- American Association of Cost Engineers International (AACEI)
- International Centre for Complex Project Management (ICCPM)
- AXELOS,
- Project Management Institute (PMI).
As demonstrated by the image above, we believe project managers have to widen their perspective of what disciplines they should be proficient in.
First, is the belief that projects managers should not be clerks just doing what they are told.
We are professionals taking a leadership role in helping the organizations successfully deliver change and obtaining the best benefits with reduced risk and cost. Though there are numerous arguments for and against project management being a profession, with leadership from countries like the United Kingdom and the Association for Project Management (APM) this is becoming a reality.
Migration from Hierarchical Governance to Collaborative and Peer Governance
We are transitioning from the hierarchical model to one where the project manager is a peer to the sponsor.
That is from this outdated model…
Image 2: Hierarchical Project Management Governance (Copyright © Peter Milsom & GPM Global 2012+)To this model…
Image 3: Peer Based Project Management Governance (Copyright © Peter Milsom & GPM Global 2012+)Project Managers Allegiance Transitioning from Output to Organizational
So what do we mean by that? Simply put, the old model had the project manager only focused on the project and project team, and only deferentially involved with the sponsor and not really involved with the organization. Acceptance, adoption, integration, business case, benefits etc. were entirely in the purview of the sponsor and organization… not the project team.
In reality though, most organizations do not understand projects or change very well at all. As well, most sponsors have no idea what their remit or responsibilities or accountabilities are. The project managers are the change delivery professionals there to help empower the organization to get the biggest bang for their investment buck from the project.
How the Organizational Allegiance Focuses on Benefits and Asset Life Cycle and Sustainability
No longer just focused on the iron triangle (please refer to the blog post (Flaws with the Iron Triangle), which is based on manufacturing and factory theory, but towards a more risk / benefits / asset life cycle / organizationally sustainable focus to reduce risk, improve the asset life cycle and protect the organizations reputation. A perspective of this evolution in our profession is outlined below:
Image 4: Evolution of the Project Management Profession (Copyright © Peter Milsom & GPM Global 2012+)
The project managers have to help the sponsor and the organization to achieve the output and the benefits that the organizational objectives and strategy demand.
In order to accomplish this though, the project manager has to be aware and competent in the whole asset life cycle perspective.
Modern Project Management Competencies and Disciplines
This requires the project manager to have an awareness (and even expertise) of the following disciplines:
- Governance
- Value Management
- Risk Management
- Asset Life-cycle Management
- Benefits Management
- Business Case
- Support Structures (PMO) and Communications, Reporting and Escalation
- Sponsorship
- Portfolio Management
- Programme Management
- Project Management
- Team Management (i.e. agile, scrum and work packages)
- Project Controls
The point being that the demands on the new project manager are significantly different from those in the past. As outlined in the post The Future of Project Managers, the demands on project managers are exponentially increasing.
Lets open it up to be a little more complicated. The International Project Management Association (IPMA) recently released the IPMA Competence Baseline 4 edition (ICB4), which is a brilliant reference that provides the key competencies for project managers, as outlined before:
Image 5: IPMA ICB4 Competency Listing for Project Managers
Start with the basics. Remember though, the basics include a solid understanding of the following:
Image 6: Earned Value Project Management (Humphrey 2014, Figure 1.8, page 39)A simpler model is below…
Image 7: Planning and Scheduling (Humphrey 2014, Figure 6.2, page 140)If you are not rock solid in these areas you have no business anywhere in the game.
The other evolution for project managers beyond the triple iron constraint and the relationship with the organization, leveraging the developing sustainability focus, will be supporting the UN Global Compact Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a planned focus for all humanity.
Image 8: UN Global Compact 17 Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs)If you want to get ahead of the game though, get proficient in the organizational focus of sustainability and social responsibility… which adds another layer of complexity and interest in the project management space, back makes you far more valuable to the organization.
Image 9: The GPM P5 Standard for Sustainable Project Management
Update
March 1 2017: GPM Global is currently changing its social media and membership strategy. The intent is to consolidate articles to ensure they do not duplicate information, and to provide relevant information for each of our stakeholders. As such, some of the more focused GPM Global intellectual property, research and references will be moved to the GPM Global Membership site, whereas the more public information will remain on the public GPM Blog and on our articles on partner sites.
If you are a registered reader and have provided comments or are a current registered reader on this blog and have liked the content and would like the original content, please contact GPM Global with the blog posts name and request for the original content.
Nice article Peter BUT…….. There is absolutely no proof that supports your statement that project management is a profession.
Project management is, as you pointed out above, a series of processes and those processes are embedded in every existing profession along with the trades and even into many operating environments, such as your local barber or beautician, automobile repair shop, dentist, family doctor, local electrician, plumber or carpenter…..
Virtually ANYONE who is involved in the service industry where clients randomly walk in or where operations have been projectized (i.e. commercial aircraft piloting where each flight is a project or a hospital operating theater where each medical procedure is a project)
Under the Federal Trade Commission Act (https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/advertising-faqs-guide-small-business):
Advertising must be truthful and non-deceptive;
Advertisers must have evidence to back up their claims; and
Advertisements cannot be unfair.
So my challenge to you is WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PROJECT MANAGEMENT IS A PROFESSION? Unless you can provide proof then aren’t you breaking the law or at least violating your GPM code of ethics?
Think about it…..
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia
There is precedent with the APM on track for chartered status. https://www.apm.org.uk/news/apm-takes-significant-step-towards-chartered-status That would make project managers in the U.K. chartered professionals would it not?
Nope……. There are 22 intrinsic and extrinsic attributes that go into any occupation being recognized and accepted as a profession and project management only scores about 35 on a scale of 0-100…….
The real “killers” are:
1) We do not nor cannot own or control the body of knowledge. (Which is why medicine and law use Latin and Greek or why professional pilots have a language all their own)
2) There is no AUTONOMY in making decisions
3) The flip side of autonomy in making decisions financial and legal liability for those decisions if they go wrong.
But when all is said and done, there has never been any occupation which was built around a process, ESPECIALLY when those processes are already embedded in every existing profession, trade and even into most operations…… I mean, can you imagine trying to build the practice of medicine around the Heimlich Maneuver?
Bottom line- just because project management is NOT a profession does not mean that there are not PROFESSIONAL project managers……… Once does not need one’s occupation to be a profession in order for one to be a professional….
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia
Dr. Paul,
As always we enjoy having this debate. One of the reasons you are an important member of GPM Global is you provide a different perspective to the debates.
Note: I am not marketing anything, selling anything or in violation of any professional ethics. Lets not be overly dramatic here.
You earned your PhD by contributing some new perspective to the discipline with your analysis on project management as a profession. You represent one informed perspective… not “the” only one. I know plenty of PhDs that disagree with your thesis. That is the nature of academia. It is not the loudest and most aggressive voice that wins. It is the debate.
The nature of the professions is changing, that is generally understood. In Canada and the UK, your definition does not fully apply, but governments have accepted project management and management consultancy to be professions. Period end statement.
Granted many things can be defined as a work package or project. My experience is that any serious project or programme is managed by a “professional” in the discipline… which takes specific training, apprenticeship and experience. Again it is the definition and interpretation of what a professional is.
1) We do not nor cannot own or control the body of knowledge. (Which is why medicine and law use Latin and Greek or why professional pilots have a language all their own)
Seriously… we need to simplify our project management speech to make it easier for our clients. Are you saying it has to have been written in Greek or Latin? And own it… I don’t think these bodies of knowledge are just restricted to doctors and lawyers… like everything else it is available online.
The first instance of projects I believe was Daniel Defoe’s An Essay Upon Projects in 1697… I believe it was written in English… As it occurred so late does it mean it does not count?
A curious point, but is the fact that the ancients had no word for blue (never shows up in the original texts) mean the colour did not exist, or there was no reason to acknowledge that colour at the time or… (Through the Language Glass – Why the World Looks Different in Other Languages, Guy Deutscher)?
Debate and argument is good… but I think we are taking this point our of context.
2) There is no AUTONOMY in making decisions
I am not sure what projects you deal with, but there is a lot of autonomy in my and my peers engagements… that is why I am hired. Though you may fall in the curious (and dated) the project manager just does what they are told category and has no free thought.
3) The flip side of autonomy in making decisions financial and legal liability for those decisions if they go wrong.
Seriously… I have had errors and omissions insurance for years to protect against that very thing. Not sure what it is like in your part of the world but it is expected in mine.
I am not breaking any code of ethics, I simply believe something else, and I have sufficient proof to justify it. I am not wrong, I am not lying, and I am not being deceptive. I just have a different interpretation.
If you do not accept it, we can agree to disagree.
Always willing to debate.
Peter
Peter, first, my research was not the FIRST on this topic. Bill Zwerman, Janet Thomas et al first published their QUALITATIVE findings in 2004 that “project management is not now, nor it is likely to become recognized as a profession”. My research published in 2008 took a QUANTITATIVE approach and used different case studies which REAFFIRMED the findings of Zwerman, Thomas et al.
Since then, there has been debate whether MANAGEMENT is a profession-
https://hbr.org/2008/10/its-time-to-make-management-a-true-profession
https://hbr.org/2010/07/the-big-idea-no-management-is-not-a-profession
https://hbr.org/2011/09/management-a-profession-wheres-the-proof
So while I agree with you that not everyone agrees with these findings, I have yet to see ANYONE publish any credible research which refutes these findings. (PMI has tried and came up short…..) And in the academic world, if there is no proof then alternative ideas are nothing more than hypothesis…..
Lastly while I agree that as an INDIVIDUAL you are not prevented from voicing your unsupported or unsubtantiated opinions, when you hold a high ranking position as a Board Member or Officer in the organization, you need to be very clear whether you are speaking as an individual or are you actually representing the GPM? IF you are representing the GPM then you probably are on shaky ground in terms of the FTC guidelines. If you are speaking as an INDIVIDUAL then certainly you are violating PMI’s paragraph 5.3.1 “We do not engage in or condone behavior that is designed to deceive others, including but not limited to, making misleading or false statements, stating half-truths, providing information out of context or withholding information that, if known, would render our statements as misleading or incomplete.” Your statements also may well violate the AACE Canon of Ethics, paragraph 1.3 “Members shall oppose any untrue, unsupported, or exaggerated statements regarding Cost Engineering and Cost Management. [I.3]”. (The GPM CoE is less specific)
Bottom line- IF you honestly believe that project management is a profession then is it being unreasonable to expect you to offer credible, substantive PROOF to back up your claims? https://hbr.org/2011/09/management-a-profession-wheres-the-proof
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
Playing devil’s advocate, the Association for project management (UK) defines it as a profession and is on the cusp of gaining chartered status. https://www.apm.org.uk/CharteredStatus They state:
Benefits of Chartered status:
– It offers assurance to users of project management services through the association’s regulating authority;
– It acknowledges project professionals as experts in their field, offering a clear differentiator between professionals and others.
– It provides a framework for improving project performance.
– It will raise the profile and value of project management
PMI sued them to try and stop this but lost.
Joel, meeting a single element of the LEGAL criteria is only part of the whole process……. In order to earn the recognition as a profession, an occupation must also meet or fulfill the socio-economic and semantic criteria (sound familiar?) which project management clearly does NOT……
What I will be really watching closely to see is if/when any project manager gets sued for malpractice once project management gets Royal Chartered status in the UK…..
And I found it more than a bit ironic that PMI was suing them to prevent it….. Quoting from Elliott Friedson, “the only difference between the trade unions and the professional societies lies in their sanctimoniousness”….
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia
Dr Paul,
At this juncture I am not writing a PhD thesis to justify a perspective that is accepted by at least two Commonwealth nations. Though in do course that might be fun.
You have a right to your informed perspective. I and others do not agree with several of your conditions. Again, the nature of professions is changing with artificial intelligence, expert systems and robotics. You may not agree, but the literature on this is clear (maybe thinking a couple decades ahead but…). I am in violation of no ethics as I can provide sufficient independent and respected justification (read Governments) to back up my perspective. You may not agree.
By the way, you have a thesis and a model that at the time was accepted. You contributed positively to the discipline. Personally I think it is still an admirable paper and a worthy contribution. It is not truth. It is not absolute. And it is open to other perspectives. In time it may be overturned by another thesis. In the meantime, I have sufficient justification from governments to say that project management and management consultancy, neither of which meet your model, is a profession. Sue them if you want.
By the way, I argued several of your real killers above.
Save your threats, I am in no violation of any of my ethical obligations.
As always, willing to discuss.
Peter
OK Peter, I understand and will be happy to apply that same logic to published research on climate change as well….. 😉
On another topic, I was more than thrilled to see you quoting Gary Humphrey’s and I would hope that you will rely on his work to update PRISM, and given I think the current PRISM has some holes in the process, I would be happy to volunteer to provide input while we wait for Michael to finish up the ILO standards……..
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta
Whose definition of profession are we using here? I’m referring to the “22 intrinsic and extrinsic attributes that go into any occupation being recognized and accepted as a profession”. Meanwhile, Peter, great piece. Would it be possible to share a pdf or Word copy of this paper for my future reference.
Daniel, this is the research behind the definition……
http://www.build-project-management-competency.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/P.Giammalvo_PHDthesis_2008.pdf
To my knowledge there have been at least 3 attempts to refute the findings of Zwerman and Thomas et al and myself, to no avail…..
Also subsequent efforts trying to establish MANAGEMENT as a profession have also gone no where….
https://hbr.org/2008/10/its-time-to-make-management-a-true-profession
https://hbr.org/2010/07/the-big-idea-no-management-is-not-a-profession
https://hbr.org/2011/09/management-a-profession-wheres-the-proof
Bottom line- UNLESS there is proof, then making this claim certainly violates professional codes of ethics if not the FTC regulations on false and misleading advertising…….
BR,
Dr. PDG, Jakarta, Indonesia
So, does it mean that Mr. Giammalvo is, with all his certifications and vast experience in the business, just an amateur of project management? A hobbyist?
No. He sees PM as black and white. Project management has a lot of gray areas and is evolving. He refuses to acknowledge that.
Dr. Giammalvo definitely does NOT see PM as “black and white,” and his research supports this by his adoption of the “Lego Block” concept as shown here https://build-project-management-competency.com/1-4-1-1-unit-1/ Figures 23-26.
This was done specifically to address the many “gray areas” and how different sectors apply the project management processes.
Where he does disagree is that project management is evolving. There have been several studies indicating that “Project Management was and remains a discipline caught in a 1960s time warp” https://www.academia.edu/45513588/Project_Management_Caught_in_a_1960s_Time_Warp_The_Sequel
And just recently, PMI announced that they are “retiring” their PMBOK Guide 6th Edition. https://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/pmbok-standards/faq-pmbok-guide-sixth-edition-retirement.pdf Why? Because people finally figured out that what PMI had been advocating for 35 years wasn’t producing any measurable improvements. (See KPMG-AIPM research 2019 & 2020)
What many, especially Millennials from the IT sector, are calling “evolution” is nothing more than “reinventing the wheel.” What IT calls “agile” in whatever combination or permutation, is nothing more than a “woke” version of the “Scientific Method” that has been delivering new products, services, and knowledge to humankind for 1000 years. https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/pmwj106-Jun2021-Giammalvo-the-bigger-picture-commentary.pdf
MAYBE “AI” and “Machine Learning” may represent a change, however until or unless we FIX what are clearly broken systems, trying to automate what already doesn’t work is a waste of time and effort.
The key was and remains to go back to the “Scientific Method,” find out what tools, techniques and methods have been tested and PROVEN to work, and then build our automated systems around those fundamental truths. (See figure 7- https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/pmwj111-Nov2021-Giammalvo-principle-based-project-management-the-whole-truth.pdf with the note that even the US Government is finally admitting that Earned Value, as defined by ANSI 748 C/D has NOT WORKED and they are in the process of REVISING it. Abba, Wayne (2023) “It’s Time to “Reboot” Earned Value Management” Defense Acquisition University Blog
https://www.dau.edu/library/defense-atl/blog/Reboot-Earned-Value-Management
3 Reynolds, Chad (2023) https://www.dau.edu/library/defenseatl/blog/PlanningfortheFutureofEarnedValueManagement
Fair Enough. By Evolving, we mean what we are doing in the profession and the diversity in organizational types that are adopting our methods and tools. Sustainability isn’t woke, it is sound business.
The whole “DEI” and “ESG” arguments are nothing more than a passing fad and one that the marketplace has already started to soundly reject. (i.e., Mulvaney and Bud Light et al?)
“Sustainability” is automatically built into the system- that which is not “sustainable” will, as Darwin told us, die out through “natural selection.”
In the world of project management, the fact that “sustainability” is alive and well can be seen in Wayne Abba/Chad Reynolds calling for changes to ANSI 748 C & D and in PMI “mothballing” their PMBOK Guide. Why? Because it didn’t work. (Have you read the AIPM/KPMG research from 2022 yet? https://info.aipm.com.au/hubfs/Reports%20and%20major%20content%20assets/The%20State%20of%20PM%202022%20Report%20FINAL.pdf )
Another example of “sustainability” are the many examples of forecasts by the “climate alarmists” that have failed to materialize. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/of-course-greta-thunberg-was-wrong-about-fossil-fuels
So yes, sustainability is a core element of “sound business,” just not in the context of the socialist agenda being advocated by Soros & Son, Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Justin Trudeau, and other left-wing “Globalists.”
What is true is that “laisses faire” Capitalism, as advocated by Ayn Rand et al. is what will ensure “sustainability” through the Scientific Method, which for 1000 years has been delivering products, services and new knowledge to humankind through project management as the DELIVERY SYSTEM of choice. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/
The concept of globalism, when misused, can inadvertently perpetuate antisemitic stereotypes. Ayn Rand’s philosophy, developed after World War II, has been subject to much criticism. Her belief in the virtue of selfishness and the condemnation of altruism, empathy, and compassion has sparked controversy. The extreme notions that the poor deserve their fate and the rich should wield unchecked power have been tested in the past, resulting in significant failures. While we appreciate the considerations in your previous comments, we hope to engage in constructive discussions rather than dismissive reactions.
Like Elon Musk, I too am a “free speech absolutist.” Many of your opinions I find offensive and downright false (“Fake News”), but I will defend your right to express them to the death even though I vehemently may disagree.
In return, I provide my honest and candid opinions, and IF those offend you, then that is YOUR problem, not mine.
NO system is perfect but I will take Ayn Rand’s views (with both the plusses and minuses) over those of the left-wing globalists. Can you name a socialist system that has ever worked?
But bringing this back to “Sustainability,” it is not something you can simply “bolt on” to any system. Sustainability is built INTO the system, and the proof of this lies in the 1000 year success of the “Scientific Method” IF adopted completely without undo or unwarranted government interference. https://sciencing.com/five-characteristics-scientific-method-10010518.html
These 5 attributes should form the CORE PRINCIPLES underlying PRISM as they apply to the SDG’s or any other application. (This should also be embraced by PMI and Rader K Rad as he rewrites the PMBOK Guide?)
Empirical Observation
The scientific method is empirical. That is, it relies on direct observation of the world, and disdains hypotheses that run counter to observable fact. This contrasts with methods that rely on pure reason (including that proposed by Plato) and with methods that rely on emotional or other subjective factors.
Replicable Experiments
Scientific experiments are replicable. That is, if another person duplicates the experiment, he or she will get the same results. Scientists are supposed to publish enough of their method so that another person, with appropriate training, could replicate the results. This contrasts with methods that rely on experiences that are unique to a particular individual or a small group of individuals.
Provisional Results
Results obtained through the scientific method are provisional; they are (or ought to be) open to question and debate. If new data arise that contradict a theory, that theory must be modified. For example, the phlogiston theory of fire and combustion was rejected when evidence against it arose.
Objective Approach
The scientific method is objective. It relies on facts and on the world as it is, rather than on beliefs, wishes or desires. Scientists attempt (with varying degrees of success) to remove their biases when making observations.
Systematic Observation
Strictly speaking, the scientific method is systematic; that is, it relies on carefully planned studies rather than on random or haphazard observation. Nevertheless, science can begin from some random observation. Isaac Asimov said that the most exciting phrase to hear in science is not “Eureka!” but “That’s funny.” After the scientist notices something funny, he or she proceeds to investigate it systematically.
Thank you for sharing your opinion. We understand that everyone is entitled to their own point of view. However, it’s essential to remember that this is our blog, and we write based on our own standards and values. We appreciate our 82,000 subscribers and aim to create content that resonates with them. If our blog doesn’t align with your preferences, we respect that and encourage you to find content that better suits your interests elsewhere. We wish you the best in finding blogs that reflect your own thinking. Thank you for understanding and respecting our space
The very essence of the Scientific Method requires that “Results obtained through the scientific method are provisional; they are (or ought to be) open to question and debate.” https://sciencing.com/five-characteristics-scientific-method-10010518.html
This is a public forum and thus, I have every right, consistent with the first rule of the Scientific Method that “relies on direct observation of the world and disdains hypotheses that run counter to observable facts” and “contrasts with methods that rely on pure reason (including that proposed by Plato) and with methods that rely on emotional or other subjective factors.” to post my opinions.
Some of the work you have done is, IMPO, great. Some of it is flat-out WRONG.
IF you think you are right and I am wrong then what do you gain by stifling contrarian opinions? Do you or do you NOT believe in science? I am more than happy to open my hypothesis and ideas (all of which we have tested and PROVEN to work in our businesses) to all 82,000 of your subscribers
“Cancel Culture” is destroying the acquisition and dissemination of new knowledge and is inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the Scientific Method.
We appreciate your participation in our blog and value diverse perspectives that contribute to lively discussions. We believe in open dialogue and encourage the free exchange of ideas. However, we must address a recurring issue.
You repeatedly engage in argumentative and disrespectful behavior, which has caused you to be banned from organizations and other platforms. Please adhere to our commenting guidelines.
I notice that your Guidelines (which appear to be modeled on Linked In, which is notoriously anti-free speech) do not contain a single word about whether a post is TRUTHFUL.
Unfortunately, as I have learned from Linked In and Twitter, speaking the TRUTH, no matter how well documented, is deemed “OFFENSIVE,” “DISRESPECTFUL,” or “ARGUMENTATIVE” to someone and thus will get you banned from these platforms.
Specifically, speaking the TRUTH about PMI’s PMBOK Guide, as evidenced by this article by PMP founding father Lee Lambert https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/pmp-pmp-that-question-lee-r-lambert and published data on the declining popularity of the PMP as published by PMI Greece President Theofanis Giotis (https://project-doctor.medium.com/has-the-project-management-institute-pmi-lost-its-credibility-and-legitimacy-as-a-501-c-6-8fc6d7314092 Question #8) got me banned from both LI and Twitter (which is in the process of being appealed directly to Elon Musk)
Getting back to the Scientific Method, are you aware that Giordano Bruno (1548–1600) was an Italian scientist and philosopher who espoused the Copernican idea of a heliocentric (sun-centered) universe as opposed to the church’s teachings of an Earth-centered universe and was burned at the stake for refusing to recant his teachings? Or that the Catholic Church also excommunicated both Nicholas Copernicus and Galileo Galilei for their teachings? http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1675/copernicus-galileo-and-the-church-science-in-a-religious-world
IF you truly want to support the principles underlying the Scientific Method, then the #1 criterion is whether something being published is the TRUTH (as evidenced by the 5 Attributes of the Scientific Method- https://sciencing.com/five-characteristics-scientific-method-10010518.html) REGARDLESS of who it may “offend” or be considered “disrespectful” or “argumentative,” all of which are subjective judgments. (Reference Justice Thurgood Marshall in Jacobellis v. Ohio decision to shed some light on the infamous “I know it when I see it” definition of pornography or obscenity.
To do anything less than venerate and hold sacred the TRUTH above all else. makes any organization today no better than the 15th or 16th Century Catholic Church. And does anyone believe that failing to venerate and hold sacred TRUTH is UNSUSTAINABLE? That ultimately, sooner or later, the TRUTH will come out?
They are our guidelines. We don’t need your approval. Since you have been banned/ostracized from basically all of project management, your own echo chamber is all you have.